The Phantom
Yesterday

Should NBA season be shortened?

Don't watch the NBA fanatically like I did when I was younger, but it seems that it's more about being the healthiest team during playoffs than being the actual best team.
So many players are coming down with soft tissue injuries that it totally derails title aspirations.
Of course they're paid extremely well, and most of that is due to the number of games televised, plus attendance etc. And there'll be the argument that players in the past did so, players aren't as tough anymore.
Medical science does help with recovery, but nothing can help the body than simply reducing the wear and tear. The league tried to counter players being rested by bringing in games played to be recognised for awards and tied to contract incentives.
Achilles like Tatum's can blow out at anytime, but I can't remember as many hamstring strains as in the last few years.
Players are bigger and stronger these days, and even all those AAU games add up.
If the league wants the best teams to compete for the title, Silver needs to make a gutsy decision to reduce it to at least 70 games and not have so many back to backs or 4 games in a week. Fans might not get as many games, but also will see players not having to be rested as much, and have them fit for playoffs. Even get the first round back to 5 games.
Main reason is broadcast money, and the old, it's always been that many games for so long.
Just seems a teams chances come down to a hamstring twinge these days, no coincidence that final 4 teams left are probably the healthiest ones.

Topic #52801 | Report this topic


word14  
Yesterday

Personally, I'd scrap the in-season tournament, and say this

-Play your four other division teams 4 times (16 games)
-Play your ten other conference teams 3 times (30 games)
-Player your 15 other conference teams 2 times (30 games)

Still a 76 game season, but a bit shorter and a simpler system

Reply #965092 | Report this post


KET  
Yesterday

I think the non-local broadcasters would actually prefer a reduction in games (because it's not a reduction of their quantity, just more important games), but the deal is locked in for the next 11 years or whatever and teams won’t want to lose the ticket and sponsorship money from losing additional games.

In a hypothetical world, I’d like to see the NBA:

- Add Las Vegas and Seattle, so now we have 32 teams
- Ditch conferences (it’s not critical to my plan, I just don’t care for the conferences)
- A club plays the other 31 clubs once at home and once away (62 games).
- A club has a rival that they play again (now we have 64 regular season games total). Broadcasters will appreciate this being kept in.
- NBA Cup is elimination like March madness. 4 groups of 8 teams play in neutral cities (great opportunity for non-NBA cities!!) to create the "Gather round" vibes. Losers play consolation round game. Each group has a winner for a final 4.
- Final 4 semis and Championship game are played the week leading up to the All Star Weekend, in the All Star city for ultimate gather round vibes.
- Each cup round is 2pts for a win, consolation round win 1pt towards the *regular season ladder*. The games all matter!
- Depending on the year, push the start of the NBA back to a ~December start (ie 3-4 weeks) so that it is a month less of competing with NFL. Nobody in the US cares about the NBA until the NFL is over.
- Push the NBA completion back, depending on the year by 2-4 weeks. So sometime in July. Ie, finish earlier to allow players to play Olympics still, and more end of July for non-Olympic years.

So teams will play anywhere between 66 and 69 games between regular season and Cup. That’s ~13-16 less games played for around the same length of season (non-Olympic years) which can help remove those back-to-back games.

More games are likely to be broadcast across the season nationally given some slots wait until after the NFL season is over.

Everyone’s a winner?

Reply #965097 | Report this post


KET  
Yesterday

I should be clearer at the start - reducing games (and not length of the season) would not be a reduction in games for the national broadcasters. The games would however, be more important and valuable*

So broadcasters would probably like a reduced number of games in a season.

Reply #965101 | Report this post




You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.



Close ads
Little Streaks - The fun and interactive good-habits app designed especially for kids.
Serio: Tourism photography and videography

Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.

Recent Posts



.


An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 6:36 am, Tue 20 May 2025 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754